Sunday, March 2, 2008

what get’s you down

Hey fellow Canadians perhaps you would like some cheese to add to your whine. Whining about gas tax but not about having the paved roads to drive on hich those gas tax help pay for. Complaining about then price of gas or having to pay before you pump. All while paying more for bottled water than you do for gas. Cry


Whining about the weather, boo hoo it raining a little like it would kill ya! Cry me a river! Cry me a Niagara falls of tears. B!T*Hing and moaning
about parking tickets when it was up to you to feed the metre.
Those metre maids do not have quotas to fill, so don’t blame them for doing their job.

Cash your GST cheque and still complain about charged GST when you buy something with it. Cry me a river; go ahead and cry. Notice the sea-planes before you buy that waterfront condo but still buy it; now those sea-planes are one more thing to moan and groan about.

Keep electing governments that make conflicting promises that don’t add up so you can complain when they can’t fill them all. Complain about the price
of anything in any store that can’t match walmart’s prices. Oh yes cry me a Niagara fall of tears, boo hoo boo hoo it’s wet out. Hold back the rain.
Don’t want this shelter in my backyard, don’t want these people who lost their home assisted on my dime even though it’s also on their dime.
They have to live somewhere why a flood zone when I live on a fault?

In other words I am a sore loser and redneck peeved they got aid and I 
did not.

Whiny stuck up Canadians with your noses so high in the air I can’t see your ugly face.
Nimbys, cry me a river, cry me a Niagara fallss of tears.

Posted by political_animal in 06:52:02 | Permalink | Comments Off

Frogways or Highways

Well money talks and the heck with wildlife, old growth trees and those dedicate to be a voice for the trees and wild life.  On Southern Vancouver Island on Canada’s west coast protesters have been sitting in trees for weeks and months, to try to stop an interchange off the highway. They are protecting trees and a frog habitat below. There is no need for such an interchange from the highway to what is called goldstream ave as there is road just a couple minutes walking distance
that connects the highway and goldstream. Last week 70 heavenly armed swat officers went in to
arrest a handful or unarmed and peaceful protesters.  To call it overkill is an understatement.  Maybe the police were expecting to find the taliban on Vancouver Island, but the Canadian constitution does say citizens have the right to peace protest it does not list any
methods such as tree sitting as prohibitted.  The police and redneck supports thought the protest
was over they were wrong as the next day other supporters of old growth and frog habitat are
to take  their place.  To add insult to injury the city of Langford (a Victoria suburb) want to sue
the protesters for policing cost.  What’s they point the city is unlikely to ever collect as the
protesters don’t have the estimated $100 000 and that’s assuming the city wins.  Policing is
a direct expense that cost the city regardless of whether they’re in the donut shop, breaking up
a fight somewhere or bothering peaceful protesters.  In that light I don’t know why the mayor
of Langford thinks he has a chance.  It is plantiff in this case the city is legal obligated to mitigate
loses and police overkill is not mitigating lose.  The fact that they have to pay for police service
regardless pretty well mitigates things.  It is clearly to intimidate people form standing up for
what they believe in.  To make things worse a developer wants to sue protesters against his
mountain side condo development for a billion dollars, that’s called unjust enrichment, that’s
called beyond greed, that’s called gimme-a-break.
Posted by political_animal in 05:55:15 | Permalink | No Comments »

Wednesday, June 7, 2006

Public vs Private vs Both

Perhaps some competition with the public sector would

do some good. Take for instance public healthcare unions,

and teachers union.  The BC Nurses union are claiming

contract out surgeries would be bad for the public system

and the BC teachers are demanding a 24% raise.

Their raise negotiated during the liberals first term put a squeeze on the

boards of trustees, and the more money going to teachers salaries
is less money to pay non teaching staff, less money to replace
their 30 year old books, and less money for computers etc.
Similarly if the government just kept increasing the education
budget to accommodate teachers demand for a raise it is less money
for health-care, social services other public yet essential employees.
 
If contracting surgeries out to private clinic results in reduced
wait times and people aren’t turned away for inability to pay
than so be it. The public union may be opposed cause they
want a monopoly, but perhaps competition would be a good
thing.  It might actually motivate them to work. It doesn’t make
economic sense to  make someone wait 2 years for say knee
surgery than have them recover for another 2 years all the while
being on social assistance when they could be working and
paying taxes and spending.
Posted by political_animal in 01:08:54 | Permalink | No Comments »

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Teachers lost in time?

            Allison Lambert’s Sept 17 2004 article in the Times Colonist titled “T-shirt Patrol

 

Shames Students in Obeying Dress Code”, shows some high school principals are

 

over controlling sticks-in-mud.  In the first two paragraphs we learn of a teenage

 

girl who showed up at Ecole Horizon Jeunesse high school, in Montreal  with bare shoulders and a plunging neckline.  She was given a choice: cover up with either

 

a jacket or a school t-shirt.  So far, at least five schools are using school t-shirts to

 

enforce dress codes. The principals’ reasoning is that t-shirts work better than

 

detentions. So, they agree that they must enforce the dress code one way or another,

 

yet don’t say why they need to enforce it. 

 

 

 

            “The consequence of dressing inappropriately is having to wear a T-shirt

 

            that they wouldn’t be caught dead in’ said Chuck Merilees, principal of St.

 

            Thomas High… Our goal is not to embarrass kids. We want to educate them”

 

 

 

            He gives no explanation how so-called inappropriate attire impedes the

 

students ability to be educated. The article doesn’t state who considers crop tops,

 

plunging necklines or strap tops inappropriate, other than the principals enforcing

 

the dress code.  The principals don’t even offer any support to their opinion why

 

such attire is inappropriate at school.  At the beginning of the year students of

 

Ecole Jeunesse are told what they can and can’t wear to class. The article doesn’t

 

say that they are told what is indecent about any forbidden attire: like the

 

girl’s strap top shown in the picture, for instance.  All Jeunesse students, are given an option of replacing or covering the offensive article of clothing before being

 

asked to put on the T-shirt. Their principal, Eric Demers, say they ‘re given a chance

 

to challenge their principal and state why the clothing should not be considered

 

indecent.

 

 

 

            “Students will usually change on their own since the t-shirt identifies the

 

            teenager as a dress code violator,  it attracts unwanted attention from

 

            other student”

 

 

 

A member of the governing board at Westwood High says it’s a good idea cause

 

it’s better than sending the students home. He gives no justification for being so

 

strict with attire that either measure should be taken. Students aren’t the only

 

ones that oppose the dress code. The principal of Jeunesse faces opposition

 

from some parents who feel schools shouldn’t enforce dress codes.

 

 

 

Posted by political_animal in 02:15:24 | Permalink | No Comments »

Wednesday, January 4, 2006

what’s next

Well just when I thought I seen it all a woman in Isreal marries a dolphin. What

is the world coming to? What will wackos marry next? I thought it is bad

enough that countries acknowledge same sex marriages; now interspecies unions?

What if the dolphin wants to remain single, or to marry a girl dophin?

On another note I believe same sex marriage should just mean only having sex

with the same person you’re married to!

Posted by political_animal in 22:06:42 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Friday, December 30, 2005

cry me French river

Now Stephen Harper is ready to give into Québec and sell out the other nine provinces. Whether Gilles Duceppe likes it or not Québec is a province not a country, and isn’t entitled to it’s own international voice.

Quite frankly, I am tired of the separatists never ending whining that their getting a raw deal. Québec’s based Bombardier’s aero division would not survive if it weren’t for subsidies from Ottawa. Québec got the contract for the CF-18s despite a cheaper bid from Manitoba; the built the 100 griffin helicopters used by the Canadian armed forces, armed coyotes etc.

 

 

The Quebecers want nine provinces officially bilingual, but Québec to be

 

 

officially French only. Québec is like the favoured and spoiled kid of the family who can get all the gifts under the Christmas tree and still not be satisfied. Anyone who says this special treatment isn’t fair is accused of being

anti-Quebec, and pro giving them a raw deal.

 

 

I am now fan of former PM Mulroney, but he was right when he told the seperatists to go to hell!

 

 

 

 

Posted by political_animal in 22:41:47 | Permalink | No Comments »