Monday, July 28, 2008

History Repeating and we’re blindly following

There’s a saying those who forget or don’t learn from history are likely
to repeat it, and two words come to my mind: George Bush! He believes
he has the God given right to impose regime change when and where he
wants, but has learned nothing of the CIA backed cue that brought the
Shah to power in Iran which came back to haunt the US of A in 1979 with
the hostage crisis after the revolution drove out the Shah and brought
in the Ayatollah. He didn’t learn from the American tragedy that Vietnam
American troops have not been seen as liberators in Iraq and Bush’s six
month war in Iraq is in it’s sixth year with no end in sight. Killing more
Americans than 9/11 itself which Saddam had nothing to do with.
Worse are those Americans who blindly believe and back their president
with no hard evidence of his claims. On 9/11/2001 the government
blaimed Osoma Bin Laden with no hard evidence not unlike Hitler blaming
the Communist for the Reichstag’s fire in 1933 in both cases people
didn’t question authority and both gave government an excuse to
suspend civil liberties in the name of protecting them.    
Bush dubbed congress and a lot of the public into an unjust  on Iraq
by lying about weapons of mass destruction which have yet to be
found and connections to 9/11 which the president later admitted
was not the case.
Similarly, Hitler dubbed Germany into World War 2 when his special
forces went on a covert operation attacking a radio station in near
their border with Poland wearing polish uniforms stolen from
an earlier covert operation and gave himself an excuse to invade
Poland.
US troops are likely to be in Iraq long after this year’s presidential
election.  Meanwhile the president does nothing military about
North Korea that openly admit having a nuclear weapons program
and boast having missiles that can reach the west coast of the USA
and if they do that means they can also reach Canada’s westcoast.
Seems both Canada and the USA have a legitimate reason to bomb
North Korea’s Nuclear reactor(s) although Canadian F18s would likely
need to refuel in flight were as one B2 stealth could make the trip
on it’s own.
Who ever wins the presidency should think twice about taking an
action against Iran without the backing of the UN in other words
learn from the error of invading Iraq. Appearantly only arms dealers
and private armies are benefitting from this prolonged war.
And no one is benefitting from the indefinite war on terror.
The war on terror is just a guise method of stripping people of
their rights to not be arrested and held without habeas corpus
or even their lawyers seeing what if any evidence the state has
against them.














Posted by political_animal at 20:59:46 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sunday, March 2, 2008

what get’s you down

Hey fellow Canadians perhaps you would like some cheese to add to your whine. Whining about gas tax but not about having the paved roads to drive on hich those gas tax help pay for. Complaining about then price of gas or having to pay before you pump. All while paying more for bottled water than you do for gas. Cry


Whining about the weather, boo hoo it raining a little like it would kill ya! Cry me a river! Cry me a Niagara falls of tears. B!T*Hing and moaning
about parking tickets when it was up to you to feed the metre.
Those metre maids do not have quotas to fill, so don’t blame them for doing their job.

Cash your GST cheque and still complain about charged GST when you buy something with it. Cry me a river; go ahead and cry. Notice the sea-planes before you buy that waterfront condo but still buy it; now those sea-planes are one more thing to moan and groan about.

Keep electing governments that make conflicting promises that don’t add up so you can complain when they can’t fill them all. Complain about the price
of anything in any store that can’t match walmart’s prices. Oh yes cry me a Niagara fall of tears, boo hoo boo hoo it’s wet out. Hold back the rain.
Don’t want this shelter in my backyard, don’t want these people who lost their home assisted on my dime even though it’s also on their dime.
They have to live somewhere why a flood zone when I live on a fault?

In other words I am a sore loser and redneck peeved they got aid and I 
did not.

Whiny stuck up Canadians with your noses so high in the air I can’t see your ugly face.
Nimbys, cry me a river, cry me a Niagara fallss of tears.

Posted by political_animal at 06:52:02 | Permalink | Comments Off

Frogways or Highways

Well money talks and the heck with wildlife, old growth trees and those dedicate to be a voice for the trees and wild life.  On Southern Vancouver Island on Canada’s west coast protesters have been sitting in trees for weeks and months, to try to stop an interchange off the highway. They are protecting trees and a frog habitat below. There is no need for such an interchange from the highway to what is called goldstream ave as there is road just a couple minutes walking distance
that connects the highway and goldstream. Last week 70 heavenly armed swat officers went in to
arrest a handful or unarmed and peaceful protesters.  To call it overkill is an understatement.  Maybe the police were expecting to find the taliban on Vancouver Island, but the Canadian constitution does say citizens have the right to peace protest it does not list any
methods such as tree sitting as prohibitted.  The police and redneck supports thought the protest
was over they were wrong as the next day other supporters of old growth and frog habitat are
to take  their place.  To add insult to injury the city of Langford (a Victoria suburb) want to sue
the protesters for policing cost.  What’s they point the city is unlikely to ever collect as the
protesters don’t have the estimated $100 000 and that’s assuming the city wins.  Policing is
a direct expense that cost the city regardless of whether they’re in the donut shop, breaking up
a fight somewhere or bothering peaceful protesters.  In that light I don’t know why the mayor
of Langford thinks he has a chance.  It is plantiff in this case the city is legal obligated to mitigate
loses and police overkill is not mitigating lose.  The fact that they have to pay for police service
regardless pretty well mitigates things.  It is clearly to intimidate people form standing up for
what they believe in.  To make things worse a developer wants to sue protesters against his
mountain side condo development for a billion dollars, that’s called unjust enrichment, that’s
called beyond greed, that’s called gimme-a-break.
Posted by political_animal at 05:55:15 | Permalink | No Comments »

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Asian missions of Canada and the United States

The liberal party has been all over the map on our army’s mission in Afghanistan

they sent the army there. They sent the army into Kandahar , yet now that it’s

costing more lives they want switch sides on the issue and blame the new

government for their mess.  Evidently they can’t accept they are for now in

opposition.  The NDP and some citizens like to cherry pick which facets  of

the mission they support and which they don’t.  Jack Layton wants to sit down

and talk with the taliban in spite of the fact the last time we did that a Canadian

soldier was hit in back of his head with a hammer. Some people want our army

with drawn but humanitarian workers to stay; why, so they can be taken hostage like

the Koreans? MPs and Canadians overall we have to decide whether they want

they support the mission or not. There is no luxury of meeting have way. If Jack

Layton or Stephion Dion headed the government in forties we would have never

liberated Holland or capture Ortona from the Nazis. Jack would have us sit down

and talk with Hitler; Mr. Dion would say, “we can’t do that it’s a combative roll”

 

Equally naïve are those  who think moving our  troops by helicopter instead  of

ground convoys would be any saver.  The taliban would just switch to using

RPGs, stingers, or Grail missiles.  Prephaps the NATO ( North Atlantic Treaty

Organization forces are naïve in assuming they can achieve what 100 000 000

Russian soldiers backed by airpower and more tanks than Canada and Holland

can shake a stick at.  The Americans sowed the seed for this chaos in Afghanistan

when they armed the mujadeen and insisted the USSR make a quick withdraw.

Now American actions of the eighties has come back to haunt them.

 

The Americans (the presidential administration) like the liberal party of Canada

are trying to wash their hands of their part in Saddam’s gassing the Kurds in the

eighties and his invasion of Kuwait . They allowed the Iraqies to fly armed

helicopters to crush the rebellions after the gulf war.  Bush junior forgot to

mention his dad and his dad’s boss (Regean) sold Saddam weapons and the sold

Iran weapons too.  Seems Uncle Sam was a contributing factor in prolonging

the Iran Iraq war.   And some (like Britney) think they should just trust their

president. They might as well say they accept dictatorship cause that’s were

blind trust of authority leads to.  Absolute power leads to absolute corruption.

Posted by political_animal at 00:26:41 | Permalink | No Comments »

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

UFOs believe or make believe?

Well I am not saying extraterrestrial space-craft for sure exist, but they

should not be discounted neither should the possibility that

maybe we have already been visited from the unknown.

For years people have been making hoax about

everything from spacecraft, to Nessie, to ghost and for generations governments have been explanations that do not fit the facts, but if you

don’t believe in something [visitors from space] does not mean

they don’t exist. On a recent episode of mystery hunters a so called

military expert discounted the notion of visitors from the unknown cause

he say caustic distances are too great, but that is just pure arrogance!

It is possible of life out there with superior technology that have

spacecraft capable of travelling at the speed of light or greater

it is possible that there are aliens with life-span of a million years

Either there is a global conspiracy to give the same descriptions

or we have had close encounters of the third and fourth kind.

In March 1997, several lights hovered in the night sky over Phoenix Arizona

these lights (seemed to be a large object in the shape of a large boomerang) were caught on several camcorders from many people living

miles a part form each,  could they have collaborated together to hoax the

same video? –not likely

it sure wasn’t a stealth since stealths don’t hover

were they really National Guard flares? this is what I mean by

explanations that do not fit the facts flares would not remain

suspended in the air (defying the law of gravity) that and it is not

legal or normally procedure to drop flares over populated areas

It wasn’t the first and may not be the last of explanations

that don’t fit the facts like: planes hovering over Heathrow airport

while their noses glow in the dark, or Venus paying a visit

the military can’t even keep their story persistent on what

.

crashed in Rosewell New Mexico in 1947

Are we alone in this mass universe? impossible

have we been visited? very possible

This does not mean that I assume any lights in the night sky

are from outer space: no way, and I do believe people

have feigned photos of flying saucers just like

people have feigned pictures of fairies and the loch ness monster

it is possible that people have faked motion picture evidence

of Sasquatch (big-foot) but it possible that some UFO

sighting and abductions are a load of B.S. and others are others

are true, much like crop circles could be created by hoaxsters

or paranormal phenomena or a combination of both

I believe it is a very strong possibility that the Earth has been visited

Posted by political_animal at 18:10:17 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sunday, August 6, 2006

what’s wrong with this picture

I think it is outrages that for both it’s terms the Government of the day can justify
their hefty 9% to 40% raise the give to top government jobs cause they claim it
is needed to attract the best and brightest.  For one they do not need to attract
people already working for the BC government.  Their will never be a shortage
of people willing to work for the government given the job security.  What about
all the healthcare workers that had a 15% pay cut, and the teachers that were
told last fall no you can’t have a 25% raise.  Is the government not worried
about attracting the best teachers or hospital clerks.  The top pay for deputy ministers
is $160 000 a year and when you multiple that by the 100 deputy ministers we
have according to Paul Wilcox’s ( Aug 5th Vic Times Colonist)editorial
that’s $16 million.  Although that may be small potatoes for BC’s budget the real question is why do we have more deputy ministers than mlas for BC.  Better still, why do we need unelected unaccountable deputy ministers at all?  The elected ministers and mlas should be making the controversial decisions not the unelected deputies.  If they are so bright why do we have longer
healthcare lineups, and who thought  it was a bright idea to close jails and eight
courthouses.  If they are so bright who thought we should sell BC rail for half it’s
book value, leading to all the derailments since.  When Dave Barret’s government
was in office there weren’t deputy ministers just ministers.
Posted by political_animal at 01:57:07 | Permalink | No Comments »

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Israel oh Israel

It is Hezbollah, that brought this havoc upon Lebanon with their anti-Semitism.
They call themselves “party of God”, but they’re full of hate, or they’d recognize
the Jew’s need a country after all the shit they went through under Hitler’s
reign. In the eighties Arafat’s PLO was a force to be reckoned with in Lebanon;
they too launched rocket and mortar attacks into Northern Israel, leading to 
their invasion of Lebanon.  Israel first bombed the South Lebanese
Mountains, destroyed Syria’s 19 mobile sam battery sites in the Bakka Valley
and moved their artillery to surround Beirut and drive the PLO out with shelling
and bombing.  Why do they think Israel should tolerate the same terror
from Hezbollah, which they didn’t tolerate from the PLO?
If the government in Beirut are unable, or unwilling to deal with Hezbollah than
the Israel Forces have to; it is their right and duty to defend their citizens.
Their is no reason for Israel to negotiate with terrorist, and the UN should seriously
consider economic sanctions against Syria and Iran to get them to stop funding
Hammas and Hezbollah. However, the Jew’s should be trying alternative ways to
deal with the Palestinians who also need a country.  If they had citizenship with
a social safety net, or equal opportunity to good jobs they might not have the
desire or time to fight their Jewish neighbours. Long live Israel.
Posted by political_animal at 02:07:01 | Permalink | No Comments »

Friday, July 14, 2006

Arms, or Doves?

So on July 12th 2006, Israel is threatening to turn back the clock to the 80’s when they invaded Lebanon.  Too bad their allies (the Christian militia, and South
Lebanonese Army) lost the civil-war.  It is also unfortunate, that both
sides can’t learn form their mistake Israel’s warplanes, and army destroyed
Beirut once before.  Arafat’s PLO was based in Lebanon’s capital
at the time, and Israel wanted to deal with them once and for all, so
they set up artillery around the city and shelled the muslim side.
Little wonder people in Lebanon hate Israel. On the flip side
 with rocket attacks, suicide attacks, and kidnappings no wonder Israel
forces pound their enemies. Don’t the Arabs and Israelis realize by now
this vicious circle is a non-solution.  How unfortunate, the Arabs can’t
go of their anti-semitism and the Jews let go of their Zionism.
Maybe, if they gave the Palestinians citizenship with voting rights and
a social safety net, and not imprison them without fair trial they
would feel no need to kill Jews, or push the Israel into the sea.
Although Israel has the right to defend herself there are two ways
to destroy your enemies: one is kill the other way is to make them
your friends. 
Posted by political_animal at 04:24:22 | Permalink | No Comments »

Wednesday, June 7, 2006

Public vs Private vs Both

Perhaps some competition with the public sector would

do some good. Take for instance public healthcare unions,

and teachers union.  The BC Nurses union are claiming

contract out surgeries would be bad for the public system

and the BC teachers are demanding a 24% raise.

Their raise negotiated during the liberals first term put a squeeze on the

boards of trustees, and the more money going to teachers salaries
is less money to pay non teaching staff, less money to replace
their 30 year old books, and less money for computers etc.
Similarly if the government just kept increasing the education
budget to accommodate teachers demand for a raise it is less money
for health-care, social services other public yet essential employees.
 
If contracting surgeries out to private clinic results in reduced
wait times and people aren’t turned away for inability to pay
than so be it. The public union may be opposed cause they
want a monopoly, but perhaps competition would be a good
thing.  It might actually motivate them to work. It doesn’t make
economic sense to  make someone wait 2 years for say knee
surgery than have them recover for another 2 years all the while
being on social assistance when they could be working and
paying taxes and spending.
Posted by political_animal at 01:08:54 | Permalink | No Comments »

Wednesday, March 1, 2006

Teacher!Teacher!

Well I use to be strongly opposed to public dollars going to private

schools, but the most expensive thing to have is a closed mind.

After talking to some students, and reading letters in the editorial.

I realize a lot of public schools just don’t care; some just move students

up whether they’re ready or not, some don’t do anything about students

who skip, their text books are 30 years old. No point in squandering money

on schools that are ineffective: schools who put kids through the system
when they can’t spell or read or do math at the level they should be able.
 Why is it so hard to get rid of bad teachers, or incompetent teachers? 
Why can’t teachers fail students who deserve it.
This is the trouble in giving the public system a monopoly, and job security to the teachers union.  Nobody else is guaranteed a job and neither should public teachers be; if they want to keep their job the should produce results

like everyone else. Give the parents education vouchers so the schools that
produce the results get the funding even if they are private schools. Maybe
then school boards will be more efficient and will be fiscally responsible.

  A system where funding is attached to the students

instead of going directly to the school would give them incentive to

do the job or they lose students funding and close.   We are not doing kids a favour in the long term, unless we only keep the best teachers and forget the rest.

Schools, especially secondary schools need to prepare students for

the real world and punish students that skip; participation in on any

school teams, or clubs need to be contingent on attendence and

effort in the classroom. If our tax dollars goes to a private school

that’s fine by me as long as they get results and accept all of God’s

children.  Maybe a private school can do a better job for the same

cost.  Maybe an end to a monopoly for the public system is the push

they need to restructure, put more funding into the classroom and keep

only the best teachers, and principals.  Perhaps funding should also

be tied to the success of the school, how many graduate and how many

grads are able to pass standardize exit test. One thing I have learned

from chatting with students are some of our schools just don’t care if

students skip, or know the material they’re suppose to know. Like in

the movie teachers they just move the kids up to get them through the

system.  In the long run they doing a diservice! Something is rotten

when public schools have a monopoly to public funding.

 

Posted by political_animal at 23:04:17 | Permalink | No Comments »